For access to various services provided on virtual machines, such as Mac Virtual or Cloud VM, VNC is an essential tool already provided with these services. For other intranet tasks, we always use VNC for embedded or free options - as they are occasional non-commercial uses. For example, we use TeamViewer for customer support, but the new RealVNC cloud has similar functionality, possibly we will adopt it next year. There are many options, but remote access depends a lot on the type of task you want to solve. In Real VNC you have the option of a cloud plan, which circumvents this limitation, but it is still a little expensive for a micro company with eventual use. In general, VNC is not transparent to the firewall, requiring port release and NAT route configuration. The fact that you have a serious business-level tool for when you need it. The fact that you can do many things virtually without spending, or spending zero, depending on what you want to do. The diversity of VNC servers, the fact that it comes integrated in equipment or operating systems, for example Raspberry PI OS. I currently use TeamViewer, but since I found RealVNC's cloud plans I am seriously considering switching to RealVNC cloud for the next renewal, next year. For use on the intranet it remains as good as ever: you access the remote computer, manipulate data, screens and functions, quick and easy, which makes it unnecessary to have a monitor connected to the development boards. We stopped actively using Real VNC for years, due to cloud limitations, but about 1-2 year ago we started using it again from the Raspberry PI and some Virtual Mac OS services.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |